Wednesday, September 2, 2015

Introducing Our International Associate Editors: Yue Zhang


Yue Zhang is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Her research interest include Comparative Urban Politics and Policy, Urban Governance, Globalization, Urbanization in Developing Countries, Historic Preservation, and Cultural Policy. Dr. Zhang has published in Studies of International Politics, Urban China Review, China Governance Review, The China Quarterly, and Urban Affairs Review, among others. Dr. Zhang received her PhD in Politics from Princeton University, and received a Stone Scholar Award in 2010, as well as a Norton Long Young Scholar Award in 2009 from the American Political Science Association's Urban Politics Section .

Tuesday, September 1, 2015

Introducing Our International Associate Editors: Jill Tao






Jill L. Tao is currently the first international professor of public administration at Incheon National University in Songdo International City, Republic of Korea.

Her specific areas of research examine the behavior of subnational governments, especially as innovators in political and economic behavior, in addressing issues of a chronic yet pressing nature: poverty, intergenerational sustainability, and resource depletion.  Prof. Tao is especially interested in comparative approaches to analyzing problems of this nature, both within and between nation-states.

Monday, August 31, 2015

Authors' Blog: Extension of State-led Growth Coalition and Grassroots Management: A Case Study of Shanghai

This is an author-produced blog post to introduce upcoming Urban Affairs Review articles. The full article can be found here in OnlineFirst

*****


Departing point of this study
The theories of growth machine and urban regime have constrained explanatory power in social contexts outside the United States, partially because they presume a specific set of sociopolitical conditions in which urban growth coalitions are embedded, and have paid insufficient attention to the relations between macro conditions and growth coalitions (Davies 2003; Lake 1990). This study intends to enhance our understanding of the variation of growth politics in urban settings of transitional societies by paying critical attention to the sociopolitical contexts of growth politics.

It takes Shanghai as a case to explore the forms and dynamics of state-led growth coalition in the residential sector in transitional China. Unlike existing studies of China’s urban growth which concentrate on the planning and decision making of urban development at municipal or district levels, this study pays attention to the management of growth related conflicts, and thus offers a more satisfactory explanation regarding the continuity of urban growth.

Friday, August 21, 2015

September 2015 Issue

Table of Contents

September 2015; 51 (5)

Articles

Research Notes

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

Authors' Blog: “Us Up Here and Them Down There”: How Design, Management, and Neighborhood Facilities Shape Social Distance in a Mixed-Tenure Housing Development

This is an author-produced blog post to introduce upcoming Urban Affairs Review articles. This article is available in OnlineFirst.

*****

“Us Up Here and Them Down There”: How Design, Management, and Neighborhood Facilities Shape Social Distance in a Mixed-Tenure Housing Development



Anouk Tersteeg

Fenne Pinkster


Despite the fact that social mix is an essential component of urban policies in Western Europe, it remains unclear at what spatial scale housing diversification programs may be most effective. When people with different backgrounds, household compositions, and lifestyles live in close proximity to one another, the emergence of close social ties is not always guaranteed. On the one hand, living in socially mixed environments may create bridges between residents of different social positions. On the other hand, it can lead to processes of social distancing and reproduce negative stereotypes. This article  explores how these diverging experiences of social closeness or distance may relate to place-specific factors that mediate everyday encounters and interactions such as housing design, management practices and the nature of local facilities and amenities.

Wednesday, July 22, 2015

Authors' Blog: Explaining ‘power to’: incubation and agenda building in an urban regime.

This is an author-produced blog post to introduce upcoming Urban Affairs Review articles. This article is available in OnlineFirst.


*****

Explaining ‘power to’: incubation and agenda building in an urban regime.



Stefania Ravazzi is assistant professor of Political Science at the University of Turin, Italy, and Vice-President of the LaPo-Laboratory of Public Policy. Her current research focuses on urban governance and deliberative democracy. Her recent contributions on these topics were published in Métropoles and Journal of Public Deliberation. She may be reached at: stefania.ravazzi@unito.it



Silvano Belligni is professor of Political Science at the University of Turin, Italy. His current research focuses on urban governance and corruption. His scholarly publications have analyzed urban power structure, local élites, water policy, the theory of governance, and corruption mechanisms.


From the urban governance perspective, although not free from structural constraints, local actors can exercise a significant influence on urban policies and affect the life conditions of residents. Within this paradigm, the urban regime theory, developed from the works of Elkin and Stone, has placed the decisional power of urban policy-makers in the foreground. From the urban regime perspective, not only can local actors systematically affect the context through their public decisions but, in particular situations, stable and enduring governing coalitions can even change the whole consolidated policy mix of a city through the implementation of a new policy agenda. Stone has labeled ‘power to’ as being the capacity to promote and sustain new urban agendas and to foster great changes in the social and economic context.


Tuesday, July 7, 2015

Author Blog: The Formation of Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) in Low-Income Immigrant Neighborhoods of Los Angeles

This is an author-produced blog post to introduce upcoming Urban Affairs Review articles. This article is now available in OnlineFirst
*****


The Formation of Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) in Low-Income Immigrant Neighborhoods of Los Angeles






Wonhyung Lee
Assistant professor, School of Social Welfare, 
University at Albany, SUNY



Business improvement districts, or BIDs, are local organizations that aim to revitalize commercial areas. BIDs are self-help organizations in which property or business owners collect funds to improve and promote their retail corridors (Briffault 1999; Houstoun Jr. 2003; Hoyt 2005; Lewis 2010). The collected funds are used for street cleaning, beautification, or security reinforcement in a designated boundary. BIDs have clearly demonstrated benefits for promoting commercial areas over the last two decades. Large and small, BIDs have multiplied rapidly: from about 400 in 1999 to about 1,000 in 2010 across the United States (Cook and MacDonald 2011). BIDs are sometimes referred to as community improvement districts (CIDs), special improvement districts (SIDs), or special services areas (SSAs) contingent on the state legislature.