This blog highlights research published in the Urban Affairs Review. The Urban Affairs Review is a peer reviewed journal published by SAGE publications focused on the politics, governance, and public policies of cities and urban regions. A link to the Urban Affairs Review website maintained by SAGE publications is located on the right side of the blog under Links of Interest.
Wednesday, September 2, 2015
Introducing Our International Associate Editors: Yue Zhang
Yue Zhang is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Her research interest include Comparative Urban Politics and Policy, Urban Governance, Globalization, Urbanization in Developing Countries, Historic Preservation, and Cultural Policy. Dr. Zhang has published in Studies of International Politics, Urban China Review, China Governance Review, The China Quarterly, and Urban Affairs Review, among others. Dr. Zhang received her PhD in Politics from Princeton University, and received a Stone Scholar Award in 2010, as well as a Norton Long Young Scholar Award in 2009 from the American Political Science Association's Urban Politics Section .
Tuesday, September 1, 2015
Introducing Our International Associate Editors: Jill Tao
Jill L. Tao is currently the first international professor of public
administration at Incheon National University in Songdo International City,
Republic of Korea.
Her specific areas of research examine the behavior of subnational
governments, especially as innovators in political and economic behavior, in
addressing issues of a chronic yet pressing nature: poverty, intergenerational
sustainability, and resource depletion. Prof.
Tao is especially interested in comparative approaches to analyzing problems of
this nature, both within and between nation-states.
Monday, August 31, 2015
Authors' Blog: Extension of State-led Growth Coalition and Grassroots Management: A Case Study of Shanghai
This is an author-produced blog post to introduce upcoming Urban Affairs Review articles. The full article can be found here in OnlineFirst
*****
*****
Departing point of this study
The theories
of growth machine and urban regime have constrained explanatory power in social
contexts outside the United States, partially because they presume a specific
set of sociopolitical conditions in which urban growth coalitions are embedded,
and have paid insufficient attention to the relations between macro conditions
and growth coalitions (Davies 2003; Lake 1990).
This study intends to enhance our understanding of the variation of growth politics
in urban settings of transitional societies by paying critical attention to the
sociopolitical contexts of growth politics.
It takes
Shanghai as a case to explore the forms and dynamics of state-led growth
coalition in the residential sector in transitional China. Unlike existing
studies of China’s urban growth which concentrate on the planning and decision
making of urban development at municipal or district levels, this study pays
attention to the management of growth related conflicts, and thus offers a more
satisfactory explanation regarding the continuity of urban growth.
Friday, August 21, 2015
Tuesday, August 18, 2015
Authors' Blog: “Us Up Here and Them Down There”: How Design, Management, and Neighborhood Facilities Shape Social Distance in a Mixed-Tenure Housing Development
This is an author-produced blog post to introduce upcoming Urban Affairs Review articles. This article is available in OnlineFirst.
*****
“Us Up Here and Them Down There”: How Design, Management, and Neighborhood Facilities Shape Social Distance in a Mixed-Tenure Housing Development
*****
“Us Up Here and Them Down There”: How Design, Management, and Neighborhood Facilities Shape Social Distance in a Mixed-Tenure Housing Development
![]() |
Anouk Tersteeg
Homepage: http://www.uu.nl/staff/AKTersteeg
|
![]() |
| Fenne Pinkster
Homepage: http://www.uva.nl/over-de-uva/organisatie/medewerkers/content/p/i/f.m.pinkster/f.m.pinkster
Despite the fact that social
mix is an essential component of urban policies in Western Europe, it remains
unclear at what spatial scale housing diversification programs may be most
effective. When people with different backgrounds, household compositions, and
lifestyles live in close proximity to one another, the emergence of close
social ties is not always guaranteed. On the one hand, living in socially mixed environments may
create bridges between residents of different social positions. On the other
hand, it can lead to processes of social distancing and reproduce negative
stereotypes. This article explores how
these diverging experiences of social closeness or distance may relate to
place-specific factors that mediate everyday encounters and interactions such
as housing design, management practices and the nature of local facilities and
amenities.
|
Wednesday, July 22, 2015
Authors' Blog: Explaining ‘power to’: incubation and agenda building in an urban regime.
This is an author-produced blog post to introduce upcoming Urban Affairs Review articles. This article is available in OnlineFirst.
*****
*****
Explaining ‘power to’: incubation and agenda building in an urban regime.
Stefania
Ravazzi is assistant
professor of Political Science at the University of Turin, Italy, and
Vice-President of the LaPo-Laboratory of Public Policy. Her
current research focuses on urban governance and deliberative democracy. Her recent contributions on these
topics were published in Métropoles
and Journal of Public Deliberation. She may be reached at: stefania.ravazzi@unito.it
Silvano
Belligni is
professor of Political Science at the University of Turin, Italy. His current research focuses on urban governance and corruption.
His scholarly publications have analyzed urban power structure, local élites, water policy,
the theory of governance, and corruption mechanisms.
From the urban governance
perspective, although not free from structural constraints, local actors can
exercise a significant influence on urban policies and affect the life conditions
of residents. Within this paradigm, the urban regime theory, developed from the
works of Elkin and Stone, has placed the decisional power of urban policy-makers
in the foreground. From the urban regime perspective, not only can local actors
systematically affect the context through their public decisions but, in
particular situations, stable and enduring governing coalitions can even change
the whole consolidated policy mix of a city through the implementation of a new
policy agenda. Stone has labeled ‘power to’ as being the capacity to promote
and sustain new urban agendas and to foster great changes in the social and
economic context.
Tuesday, July 7, 2015
Author Blog: The Formation of Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) in Low-Income Immigrant Neighborhoods of Los Angeles
This is an author-produced blog post to introduce upcoming Urban Affairs Review articles. This article is now available in OnlineFirst.
*****
*****
The
Formation of Business Improvement Districts (BIDs) in Low-Income Immigrant
Neighborhoods of Los Angeles
Wonhyung
Lee
Assistant
professor, School of Social Welfare,
University at Albany, SUNY
Business improvement districts, or BIDs, are local
organizations that aim to revitalize commercial areas. BIDs are self-help
organizations in which property or business owners collect funds to improve and
promote their retail corridors (Briffault
1999; Houstoun Jr. 2003; Hoyt 2005; Lewis 2010). The collected
funds are used for street cleaning, beautification, or security
reinforcement in a designated boundary. BIDs
have clearly demonstrated benefits for promoting commercial areas over the last
two decades. Large and small, BIDs have multiplied rapidly: from about
400 in 1999 to about 1,000 in 2010 across the United States (Cook and MacDonald 2011). BIDs are sometimes referred to as community
improvement districts (CIDs), special improvement districts (SIDs), or special
services areas (SSAs) contingent on the state legislature.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



